subscribesubscriber servicescontact usabout ussite mapBuy a Classified
Tue, Nov 24 2009 

Published: December 26, 2008 07:39 pm    print this story  

With fewer hunters, up bag limits

Michael A. Sawyers
Cumberland Times-News

Fact is, the number of hunters is on the dip.

Should this trend continue — and there is no indication that it will end — fish and game departments throughout the country need to make some alterations because of it.

The primary problem will be shortage of money because of declining license sales. That could be taken care of pretty easily by increasing the cost of the license to cover the shortfall. Shoot, the Maryland Fisheries Service doubled the cost of a fishing license recently. That means, of course, the agency can sell half as many licenses and make the same amount of cash.

However, increases could continue to take place for only so long before they would actually cause hunters to stop buying licenses because of the cost.

In addition, I think the name “wildlife management area” should be changed to “public hunting area” or “wildlife area” in Maryland. There is precious little management taking place because of the financial situation. There used to be wildlife technicians actually stationed at Dan’s Mountain WMA to do the labor necessary to manage that parcel for wildlife. No longer.

I’m thinking, though, more about the fact that hunters, especially deer hunters, help to control animal populations that would otherwise grow to problematic levels.

I have touched on the subject here before. I believe that as the number of hunters dwindle, the number of animals that remaining hunters are allowed to bag should increase.

It should be relatively simple to create a formula to deal with the situation.

A state wildlife agency can simply look at the number of hunting licenses sold for a particular year, look at the number of deer killed and then compare that to the number they would like to see killed.

Such an investigation should allow the biologist/mathematicians to say “Well, since we are down to this many hunters now, we will need to increase the bag limit of deer to this certain level to reach that certain kill.”

You might as well just take the limit off of squirrels right now. Nobody is hunting them anyway. Take off the limit and make the season year round. Same thing with Canada geese, at least around here. Run the season from August to March. They are difficult to hunt and they learn quickly once shot at.

I contend that harvest numbers for critters such as deer and turkeys are not skyrocketing simply because there are fewer people hunting.

Some folks look at the harvest numbers, especially in years when they decrease, and say it is because there are fewer animals. I don’t think that is necessarily so, at least not all the time.

I spend a lot of time in the boondocks during the autumn months. I am one of those sorts of folks who agrees that I am seeing less and less rutting activity by our whitetail deer. I don’t think that is because there are fewer deer.

I think it could be because there are more deer and the deer don’t have to run around like crazy scraping, rubbing and chasing does helter skelter up hills and across fields.

The bucks just walk over to the nearest oak grove, spot a cutey and say “Hey, baby. You sure smell good.”

I have seen more dead deer on local highways this year than for many a moon; not as many, though, as during the hey days of deer hunting in Allegany County in the mid-1990s.

If we stay with this one-buck, one-doe per season (bow-rifle-muzzleloader) in Almost Maryland for a few more years I believe you will once again have those mid-1990s kind of deer numbers. There will, however, be fewer hunters to bag these animals, so you may not see the same harvest levels.

Also playing a large role is the loss of private lands upon which local people have hunted. Think about it. If you have not personally lost access to lands upon which you and your buddies use to hunt deer, I bet you know a person or two who has.

In a part of the world as geographically paltry as Almost Maryland, there is a big impact when you start adding up 200 acres here and 2,000 acres there upon which deer may no longer be taken for whatever reason... usually development.

Like you, and like Brian Eyler who heads up deer management for the Maryland Wildlife Service, I’ll be interested in seeing the entire deer harvest picture when bow season ends with the passing of January.

The firearms harvest of bucks in Allegany County was down a smidgen this year, 70-some animals. One possible influence on that number could be outstanding kills during the bow and early muzzleloader season.

Contact Outdoor Editor Mike Sawyers at msawyers@times-news.com.



print this story  



autoconx
Premier Guide
Find a business

Walking Fingers
Maps, Menus, Store hours, Coupons, and more...
Premier Guide
Premium Jobs

Hawse Health Center
in Baker, Hardy County, West Virginia is seeking a full-time behavioral health therapist to provide on-site and school-b...>MORE

PTI Is Seeking Drivers For

7 Passanger Minivan In
Cumberland. Drug Screening, Clean Driving Record,
Criminal Background Check And
...>MORE

HEALTH INFORMATION CODER


Full time position. Codes and abstracts inpatient and
outpatient records utilizing ICD-9-CM and CPT-4
...>MORE

See all ads

Premium Autos

Call our Classified department
at 301.722.4604 to advertise here!...>MORE

See all ads

Premium Extras

Call our Classified department
at 301.722.4604 to advertise here!
...>MORE

See all ads


Tri-State Home Finder Tri-State Travel Companion

 

Community Newspaper Holdings, Inc.CNHI Classified Advertising NetworkCNHI News Service
Associated Press content © 2009. All rights reserved. AP content may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
Our site is powered by Zope and our Internet Yellow Pages site is powered by PremierGuide.
Some parts of our site may require you to download the Flash Player Plugin.
View our Privacy Policy
Advertiser index