Cumberland Times-News

Editorials

May 7, 2013

New Internet law can crush individual freedoms

CUMBERLAND — The war to control the Internet began after Congress quietly passes a law allowing U.S. authorities to access foreign birth certificate repositories to identify worldwide Internet users.

It’s part of an alarming trend with numerous countries invoking Internet freedom crushing laws, carving the Internet into individual “Country Intranets,” which could block the free flow of information and threaten the future of the Web.

Surprisingly, everyone is oblivious to this unjustified law which delves deeply into international personal relationships, that one has to question the purpose, which could undermine foreign relations.

All the details, that few Congressmen read, are in an unnoticed attachment in the recently passed Violence Against Women Act (S-47).

Section 808 regulates “marriage brokers” (similar to social referral or dating sites) that are prohibited from providing services to foreigners under 18. Foreign clients must submit their birth certificate information or government ID before communication with Americans can begin, and allows U.S. authorities access to this sensitive information, effectively creating an Snternet police force.

At first glance the stated purpose “to prevent marketing of underage children” by international marriage brokers seems reasonable. However, logic reveals that Section 808, an immigration provision, is pointless — an underage child cannot legally immigrate for the purpose of marriage. And why is it illegal for an 18-year-old American to say “Hello” to a 17-year-old Canadian?

The sinister term “marriage broker” is a spoof coined by special interests while crusading for the International Marriage Broker Regulation Act, the parent law of section 808. The legal definition of “marriage broker” is so broadly tailored that any online communication for social referral, friendship or dating could nefariously be regulated now, or in the future.

Americans are exempted from providing birth certificates, an obvious insult to our allies, who never asked for such excessive protection in the first place.

What would prevent other countries from retaliating by enacting laws requiring Americans to submit their birth certificates or other requirements prior to saying “hello” to their citizens?

This plugs into the debate about increasing governmental control of the Internet which threatens a free and open Internet according to Tim Berners-Lee, the creator of the World Wide Web.

Section 808 gives a green light for other countries to regulate Internet communication for any arbitrary reason, which plays into the applauding hands of oppressive regimes who can point to the U.S. to justify their actions.

Part of the blame falls on VAWA author and Senate Judiciary Chairman, Pat Leahy (D-VT) who approved the legislation as a pet project for the ideological gains of special interests.

If Sen. Leahy had done his own work, he would have realized that section 808, a gateway law, paves the way for future governmental control of both social networking and dating sites which have evolved into similar communication venues for friendship, acquaintance or romance, a legitimate pursuit.

Regardless, Congress has no right to place arbitrary restrictions on legitimate communication across the Web, a gross affront to human rights.

Not everyone who uses a social referral or dating site would be regulated as a “marriage broker” client. Currently, the law exempts companies that charge similar fees and offers comparable services for everyone, regardless of nationality or gender.

But, if Facebook, for example, began a gender-based fee structure it could easily be regulated as a “marriage broker.”

Because the law became effective May 6, foreigners who communicate with Americans for friendship, dating or any purpose in the future, should be prepared to provide personal information under the scrutiny of government bureaucrats.

In the meantime Congress has an obligation to stop this reckless foreign policy madness and repeal Section 808.

Dave Root

Damascus

 

1
Text Only
Editorials
  • No secrets No secrets

    The idea of fracturing for natural gas makes many people anxious about potential harmful effects. For that reason alone, it is incumbent on Maryland government to require full disclosure of chemicals used in the process.

    July 21, 2014 1 Photo

  • Don’t do it. Don’t do it

    Temperatures have been moderate recently but are projected to rise to the upper 80s and low 90s later this week, so we want to remind you: Never leave children unattended in a vehicle.

    July 21, 2014 1 Photo

  • July 20, 1969 July 20, 1969

    When Apollo 11 landed on the moon 45 years ago today, it was until that time the mostwatched television programming in history.

    July 20, 2014 1 Photo

  • Stopgap

    Kicking the can down the road was one of the things American kids did to pass the time in the old days, particularly if they lived in rural areas where there was little traffic to contend with.

    July 16, 2014

  • Maryland on target to meet 2025 bay restoration goals

    July 16, 2014

  • Tough luck Tough luck

    The state has for a second time declined to help Allegany County get federal flood recovery funds in the wake of the June 12 storm.

    July 15, 2014 1 Photo

  • Heard it all Heard it all

    Pesky thing, this requirement that political candidates file campaign finance reports.

    July 14, 2014 1 Photo

  • Build it now Build it now

    Anticipated savings from demolition work that will provide ground for a new Allegany High School on Haystack Mountain may allow the addition of an auditorium at the school.

    July 14, 2014 1 Photo

  • Get on with it

    Now that Maryland State’s Attorney General Doug Gansler has been asked to help with the investigation of the McCoole Volunteer Fire and Rescue Department it is our hope that the probe regains traction.

    July 12, 2014

  • A good turn A good turn

    “Do a good turn daily” is the slogan of the Boy Scouts of America. “Turn,” in this case, means a deed ... a good deed you didn’t really have to do, but you did it because it would make somebody else’s life a little better.

    July 10, 2014 1 Photo