Cumberland Times-News

Letters

December 20, 2012

Protect the public while safeguarding our rights

All of us were shocked and horrified at the elementary school shooting in Connecticut. None of us can fathom the loss these families have suffered and will endure for the rest of their lives. This is a tragedy that we mere mortals will never fully understand.

Our reaction to the slaughter of innocents must be tempered by time and brutal analysis. We cannot afford to jump to conclusions on its cause.

Likewise, we cannot waste our efforts on corrective measures that do nothing more than feel good or allow bombastic rhetoric from either side of the question to cloud sound judgment. We must be realistic and honest. We cannot assume anything.

We know from the shootings at Virginia Tech several years ago that the shooter had mental issues. Likewise the Colorado theater murderer was being treated for mental difficulties as well.

We must ask: How did these people legally purchase the weapons they used to kill? When you or I purchase a weapon the gun dealer must call for a clearance number to ensure that we are legally permitted to own a weapon.

Our name and other personal information is called into a national clearing house to run a criminal record check and allow the dealer to complete the sale. If you don’t pass the check, you don’t get the weapon.

A madman in Scandinavia killed nearly 90 people with improvised explosives. Many of his victims were children. Scandinavian countries have far stricter gun laws than many states here at home. That being said, stricter gun control laws do not equate to a safer society.

I accept the inherent responsibility of owning a weapon. I am fully aware of the consequences of misuse both on the range and in the field. In my training in the military and my work in the prison system I benefited from professional training.

One fact was always stressed in my training: Once fired my bullet has no brain, it will go where I tell it to go. Mistakes change lives forever.

How do we prevent atrocities like these massacres? It is not simply a case of more regulations and bans. The Scandinavian attack shows a person bent on murder can mix a few household chemicals  and cause great damage and loss of life. You do not need high capacity weapons to cause mass casualties and fatalities.

How do we protect the public at large and safeguard the constitutional liberties of honest citizens who accept the responsibility of owning a weapon?

It would make sense to me that if you have a mental health issue, you shouldn’t be allowed to buy a weapon. Why can’t a mental health check be included with the criminal record check?

If the police have to report your criminal record, if you have one, shouldn’t a psychiatrist report on you if he feels that you may become violent or have a clouded view of right and wrong?

A police officer can get our criminal records in moments; he will take appropriate action if we are wanted or have a pending warrant.

The dealer does not need to know the buyer has mental problems. He needs to know the guy should not be able to buy a gun. Why the dealer can’t be told, during the call, to contact police to follow up on this prospective buyer?

Americans have the right to be secure and safe in their homes, school, and workplaces. Whatever actions we take to safeguard the public must be balanced with the rights of the individual citizen. When we sacrifice liberty for the sake of security, we lose both.

Jeff Robinette

Cumberland

1
Text Only
Letters
  • Translations differ, but the message is eternal

    This letter is in response to a recent letter titled “One cannot compromise on God’s word” (April 13 Times-News). I had previously written a letter titled “Why are compromises so difficult to achieve” (April 7).

    April 15, 2014

  • Closing the loopholes will help clear the regulatory waters

    After a decade of uncertainty over Clean Water Act jurisdiction following Supreme Court challenges in 2001 and 2006, the Environmental Protection Agency and Army Corps of Engineers announced a forthcoming administrative rule to close enforcement loopholes, restoring protections to 20 million acres of wetlands, more than half the nation’s streams, and drinking water for 117 million Americans.

    April 15, 2014

  • The first step Remember where your freedom comes from before criticizing

    The deal at Fort Hood could have been avoided if it was caught in time.
    When you think a GI is not acting right, have him or her checked out before you put them back on duty and give them a weapon. Post-traumatic stress disorder is a serious and dangerous problem if it is not taken care of right away.

    April 15, 2014 1 Photo

  • Midterm elections give chance to return to American values

    A movement has been started by veterans of our armed forces to get out the vote in 2014. That includes Coast Guard and Merchant Marine personnel for those not familiar with the history of both and their sacrifice. This is no small special interest  group, but many millions of Americans who can have an enormous impact on the  outcome of the November election if they all respond.

    April 14, 2014

  • Military veterans have few friends in Washington, D.C.

    Our legislators in Washington must stop playing politics with our veterans, this is  especially true of Vietnam war veterans. Will the game playing carry over to our veterans of present day wars? Will they too become pawns? Veterans have few friends in Washington. Just like the Vietnam veterans, today’s veterans will face
    what we are up against, little to no support.

    April 13, 2014

  • One cannot compromise on God’s word

    A recent letter asked, “What is it about compromises that seem so undesirable?” Most of us are familiar with John 3:16, which says, “For God so loved the world that he gave his only son, that whoever believes in him should not perish but have eternal life.” The next verse goes on to say, “For God did not send his son into the world to condemn the world, but in order that the world might be saved through him”

    April 13, 2014

  • Ballpark project a partnership, not a government handout

    To the Editor:
    Regarding Mark Nelson’s recent objection to county government assistance to exploring the placement of a minor league baseball team in the Cumberland region, I would answer that the project should be considered a partnership between private enterprise and government. The private support would come by way of donations collected from local citizens, currently banked through the Dapper Dan Club.

    April 13, 2014

  • Group wants status quo on Sunday hunting

    Many Maryland residents have grown very concerned about two legislative bills that are arriving on the desk of Gov. Martin O’Malley after being approved by both the Senate and House chambers this session. With the governor’s possible signature of these bills into law, hunting would be allowed on certain state lands on Sundays — a day in the past reserved for rest and non-hunters to enjoy public lands.

    April 10, 2014

  • New policies will grow better streamside buffers

    Well-functioning forest buffers along streams are perhaps the most effective and least costly best management practice we have to restore the Chesapeake Bay.

    April 10, 2014

  • City has changed, but it’s still a great place

    Is it better to be positive or negative? I have been reading postings about Growing Up in Cumberland, other Facebook pages, and from many of my Facebook friends. Talk about food and many people have positive comments. I love Coney Island hot dogs as much as anyone and have some every time I am in Cumberland.

    April 9, 2014

Latest news
Facebook
Must Read
House Ads