Cumberland Times-News

Letters

September 24, 2013

Minimum wage hike would be beneficial

In reading Times-News editorials I’ve noticed a general absence of discussions regarding controversial topics. However, the editorial of Sept. 6 titled, “Don’t do it: Minimum wage hike would have negative results” was an exception.

The Times-News argued that it would be a mistake for Maryland to raise its minimum wage from $7.25 to $12.50 per hour. Permit me to respectfully dissent.

Evidently the editorial’s view that a minimum wage hike would have negative results is based on the rationale that such action would boost unemployment and eliminate “thousands of jobs.”

While I do agree that a shift from $7.25 to $12.50 is probably too large for any business to handle immediately (It would amount to a 58 percent raise!), clearly the proposition that minimum wage increases lead to a loss of jobs is bogus. History tells us such action actually stimulates economic growth.

The federal government first established a minimum wage in 1938. It was set at $.25 per hour. At that time there was substantial opposition to this policy because many believed it would hurt business and the economy. There have been 28 increases since that time and at each juncture opponents voiced the same position that such a policy would mean higher unemployment, etc.

So what actually happened in all of these cases? When the minimum wage was increased all other incomes were proportionately increased, consumers had overall more funds to spend on goods and services, thus the business world needed to hire more workers to keep up with the increased demand for their products. In short this process goes a long way in explaining how the famed American middle class was formed.

The legendary Henry Ford, who definitely was no slouch when it came to running a business, producing cars and making money, understood this principle well. He reportedly said that he wanted to give his workers sufficiently high wages so they could afford to buy his cars.

Just as Ford did, any successful businessman or woman today views his or her workers as assets, not expenses! A common refrain expressed by these business leaders is: “Our favorable outcome is because of our people.”

My second argument supporting increasing minimum wage is a moral one. I feel it’s clearly immoral for America, the wealthiest country in history, despite giving lip-service to the high value of work, to relegate millions of her working citizens to poverty status with pitiful incomes and no significant benefits.

While giving only nominal value to work, I feel regrettably that we Americans place an extremely high value on money. Due to this an individual’s worth is measured largely by his or her income and wealth.

In the economic sectors most directly impacted by a minimum wage increase — the retail sales, fast-food and hospitality industries — are the executives really worth more than those on the front-line performing the actual tasks associated with making and delivering the product?!

It is common knowledge that income (and wealth) inequality has been dramatically increasing since about 1980.

Although those fortune ones at the top have seen their incomes skyrocket, the low wage-earner’s inflation adjusted income has decreased. Why has this happened? Why do the rich continue to get richer and the poor become poorer? Is this moral? What would Jesus say?

There is another value many Americans share. This is the supreme importance we place upon the teachings contained within God’s Word. One of these sacred messages of the Good Book is that we will be judged by God in how we “treat the least of these.” It seems to me that low wage-earners, struggling daily to have the basic necessities of food, clothing and shelter, would fall within this category.

R. Steele Selby

Frostburg

1
Text Only
Letters
  • Support Canal classrooms with tax-deductible gift

    While your April 17 article (“Park Service opens Canal classrooms,” Page 1A) described this exciting program accurately, your readers may be wondering how they can help support this new educational opportunity for school children in Allegany County.

    April 18, 2014

  • Ivan Hall story brings back memories of a unique man

    I enjoyed Mike Sawyers’ Ivan Hall story. It was well written and brought back some wonderful memories of my Cumberland days and especially, an unique man.

    April 18, 2014

  • It’s a secret It’s a secret

    Could someone enlighten us about why not even the names of the two entities bidding on development of the Footer Dye Works building can be divulged?
    A Times-News article about the bids included an explanation from a lawyer for the attorney general’s office about the need to keep the names and other information secret at this time. Despite that, the logic of not divulging at least a little more information escapes us.

    April 17, 2014 1 Photo

  • What do we do about those who weren’t criminals after all?

    Now that Maryland has become the 17th state to (finally) decriminalize possession of marijuana, one could say that the legislature and governor should be patted on the back for doing the right thing.

    April 17, 2014

  • Which approach to the school makes sense?

    What exactly is the long-range plan, according to the Allegany County Commissioners?
    I’ve read in the Cumberland Times-News that the current County Commissioners intend to spend $9 million to construct a new high school.

    April 16, 2014

  • H.O.G. Rally coming to Cumberland in June

    Let me introduce myself. My name is Francine Kraft and I am the Maryland/Delaware State H.O.G. Rally Coordinator for 2014.
    With a team of seven others, we have put together a rally for June 19-22 to be held in Cumberland.

    April 16, 2014

  • Access to trout ponds hard for those who have trouble walking

    I took my 5-year-old grandson Easton, who lives in Cumberland, to the Evitts Creek three ponds on March 31, the day it was stocked with trout.He had the joy and excitement of catching his first trout and two more. I have a Maryland fishing license and trout stamp.

    April 16, 2014

  • Wait long enough; they will die off without being cared for

    The letter to the editor of April 14 (“Military veterans have few friends in Washington, D.C.”),  I am afraid, hit the nail on the head — sort of — about this next set of returning veterans.

    April 16, 2014

  • Translations differ, but the message is eternal

    This letter is in response to a recent letter titled “One cannot compromise on God’s word” (April 13 Times-News). I had previously written a letter titled “Why are compromises so difficult to achieve” (April 7).

    April 15, 2014

  • Closing the loopholes will help clear the regulatory waters

    After a decade of uncertainty over Clean Water Act jurisdiction following Supreme Court challenges in 2001 and 2006, the Environmental Protection Agency and Army Corps of Engineers announced a forthcoming administrative rule to close enforcement loopholes, restoring protections to 20 million acres of wetlands, more than half the nation’s streams, and drinking water for 117 million Americans.

    April 15, 2014

Latest news
Facebook
Must Read
House Ads