Cumberland Times-News


March 11, 2013

Arms taken and banned to subdue populace

Our Bill of Rights was modeled after the British Bill of Rights of 1689. Clearly the right to bear arms has been part of our heritage.

It is not about hunting, not about sportsmanship, not about personal defense not even about invading armies, but instead oppression from our own government.

How can anyone this day and age after the corrupt passage of Obamacare, where all decency was suspended, every rule broken and in advent of a thoroughly corrupt fourth estate not worry about an oppression similar to Germany, Russia and China; where gun control allowed the deaths of 56,000,000 all told.

Gun control has resulted in hundreds of times more deaths than the lack thereof. How many died in Maryland last year as a result of assault weapons?

The FBI stated that it does not break these statistics down per state. This is clearly an Alinskyite opportunity to restrict and enact a pre-existing old liberal dream.

Why not ban every automobile with the capacity to travel over 50 mph. Those are the vehicles that have killed more people than guns. After all, we would have no DUIs without cars. These assault vehicles need to be banned immediately as weel as the gasolene that goes in them.

  The Bill of Rights was an Act of the Parliament of England passed on Dec. 16 1689, far earlier than ours. It was a restatement in statutory form of the Declaration of Right presented by the Convention Parliament to William and Mary in March 1689.

It laid down limits on the powers of the crown and sets out the rights of Parliament and rules for freedom of speech in Parliament, the requirement to regular elections to Parliament and the right to petition the monarch without fear of retribution.

It reestablished the liberty of Protestants to have arms, and condemned James II of England for “causing several good subjects being Protestants to be disarmed at the same time when papists were both armed and employed contrary to law.”

Arms were taken and forbidden. Not by foreign army but to subdue the populace! The colonists were familiar with history!

 The ideas about rights reflected those of the political thinker John Locke and they quickly became popular in England. It also set out, certain constitutional requirements of the Crown to seek the consent of the people the people to rule. Not otherwise ... Mr. O’Malley, Mr. Obama, or Ms. Feinstein.

Provisions of the act included freedom to petition the monarch without fear of retribution,no standing army may be maintained during a time of peace without the consent of parliament. And no royal interference in the freedom of the people to have arms for their own defense, rights that were previously taken from Protestants by James II, not a foreign government. The Germans, Russians, and Chinese were not enslaved by a foreign government.

The Founding Fathers knew what the term arms meant. There’s no question as the meaning of the Second Amendment, according to Robert Blakey, author of the RICO Act, investigator in the second congressional investigation of the death of John Kennedy.

Blakey is the professor of criminal law at University Notre Dame Law School. He says any scholar who contends otherwise is dishonest!

Our freedoms in Maryland are being butchered! Taken a slice at time. What stands in the way of total domination? Will we end up like the Czechs in the 1970s throwing potatoes at tanks, while the national media cheers on the tanks?  


Wayne Pennington


Text Only
  • Celebrate Earth Day every day: Reduce, reuse and recycle

    April 1 marked the beginning of April Envi- ronmental Education Month in Maryland — and with Earth Day coming up on April 22, Maryland has much to celebrate.

    April 20, 2014

  • Support Canal classrooms with tax-deductible gift

    While your April 17 article (“Park Service opens Canal classrooms,” Page 1A) described this exciting program accurately, your readers may be wondering how they can help support this new educational opportunity for school children in Allegany County.

    April 18, 2014

  • Ivan Hall story brings back memories of a unique man

    I enjoyed Mike Sawyers’ Ivan Hall story. It was well written and brought back some wonderful memories of my Cumberland days and especially, an unique man.

    April 18, 2014

  • It’s a secret It’s a secret

    Could someone enlighten us about why not even the names of the two entities bidding on development of the Footer Dye Works building can be divulged?
    A Times-News article about the bids included an explanation from a lawyer for the attorney general’s office about the need to keep the names and other information secret at this time. Despite that, the logic of not divulging at least a little more information escapes us.

    April 17, 2014 1 Photo

  • What do we do about those who weren’t criminals after all?

    Now that Maryland has become the 17th state to (finally) decriminalize possession of marijuana, one could say that the legislature and governor should be patted on the back for doing the right thing.

    April 17, 2014

  • Which approach to the school makes sense?

    What exactly is the long-range plan, according to the Allegany County Commissioners?
    I’ve read in the Cumberland Times-News that the current County Commissioners intend to spend $9 million to construct a new high school.

    April 16, 2014

  • H.O.G. Rally coming to Cumberland in June

    Let me introduce myself. My name is Francine Kraft and I am the Maryland/Delaware State H.O.G. Rally Coordinator for 2014.
    With a team of seven others, we have put together a rally for June 19-22 to be held in Cumberland.

    April 16, 2014

  • Access to trout ponds hard for those who have trouble walking

    I took my 5-year-old grandson Easton, who lives in Cumberland, to the Evitts Creek three ponds on March 31, the day it was stocked with trout.He had the joy and excitement of catching his first trout and two more. I have a Maryland fishing license and trout stamp.

    April 16, 2014

  • Wait long enough; they will die off without being cared for

    The letter to the editor of April 14 (“Military veterans have few friends in Washington, D.C.”),  I am afraid, hit the nail on the head — sort of — about this next set of returning veterans.

    April 16, 2014

  • Translations differ, but the message is eternal

    This letter is in response to a recent letter titled “One cannot compromise on God’s word” (April 13 Times-News). I had previously written a letter titled “Why are compromises so difficult to achieve” (April 7).

    April 15, 2014

Latest news
Must Read
House Ads