Cumberland Times-News


August 29, 2013

Have ‘Road to Damascus’ moment, stop Obama

I am confident you are familiar with the conversion of St. Paul on the road to Damascus that can be found in The Acts of the Apostles, 9:1-19.

The “Road to Damascus” moment is often used as a reference when someone has a revelation on an issue that has a most profound effect on their life. Few, if any, can come close to the event that changed the life of a man who sought to persecute the early Catholic Church to becoming a saint worthy of the title, “Apostle to the Gentiles.”

So, 2,000 years later, President Obama is telling us we are going to Damascus. And it’s not for another vacation, but rather to drop some bombs. The reasoning is that Syrian President Bashar Assad has allegedly used chemical weapons on his own people during Syria’s civil war — a civil war that pits the established regime against members of the same group that murdered over 3,000 people during the attacks of Sept. 11, 2001.

So let me be clear by saying that the use of chemical weapons is an atrocity and unacceptable. However, as Patrick J. Buchanan points out in his article “Congress Should Veto Obama’s War” at The American Conservative, there are many questions that need to be answered before President Obama goes off acting like the “Wyatt Earp of the global village.” And while those questions should be answered, there is also the fundamental question regarding where in The Constitution does the president, any president, have the authority of a king to wage war and drop bombs on a country that has not attacked us?

Do I expect President Obama, Vice President Biden, Secretary of State Kerry, or the neo-cons in the Senate like Senators McCain and Graham to have that “Road to Damascus” moment? No. I don’t. It would be nice, really nice, but I suspect I’d have better luck hitting the jackpot on the first spin on one of the shiny new one armed bandits out at Rocky Gap than these guys to do the right thing.

My prayers and hopes lie with many of you who voted to put and keep Obama in the White House in the first place. You were silent when President Obama resigned the Patriot Act. You were silent when President Obama signed the NDAA which allows for the indefinite detention of Americans. You were silent when the NSA was discovered that it is spying on you and President Obama lied about it. You were silent when it was disclosed that President Obama has a “kill list” and has authorized the killing of Americans without trial. I can go on and on, but the fact is you have remained silent. You have remained silent. You have remained silent. You have remained silent.

If it was not acceptable to you when President Bush had the approval of Congress, why will you remain silent and allow President Obama to take on the role of king and bypass Congress so we can drop bombs? Where is the anti-war left? Where is the “Hell no, we won’t go!” crowd? Where is the “Make love, not war” movement? Should you not give a damn it won’t be off to Vietnam. It will be worse.

So please, you who voted for Barack Obama. Have that “Road to Damascus” moment and stop him from unilaterally acting to go to war. I urge you to call your respective senators and representatives and tell them this issue needs to be debated, discussed and reviewed by Congress.

Richard R. Biancone Jr.


Text Only
  • Support Canal classrooms with tax-deductible gift

    While your April 17 article (“Park Service opens Canal classrooms,” Page 1A) described this exciting program accurately, your readers may be wondering how they can help support this new educational opportunity for school children in Allegany County.

    April 18, 2014

  • Ivan Hall story brings back memories of a unique man

    I enjoyed Mike Sawyers’ Ivan Hall story. It was well written and brought back some wonderful memories of my Cumberland days and especially, an unique man.

    April 18, 2014

  • It’s a secret It’s a secret

    Could someone enlighten us about why not even the names of the two entities bidding on development of the Footer Dye Works building can be divulged?
    A Times-News article about the bids included an explanation from a lawyer for the attorney general’s office about the need to keep the names and other information secret at this time. Despite that, the logic of not divulging at least a little more information escapes us.

    April 17, 2014 1 Photo

  • What do we do about those who weren’t criminals after all?

    Now that Maryland has become the 17th state to (finally) decriminalize possession of marijuana, one could say that the legislature and governor should be patted on the back for doing the right thing.

    April 17, 2014

  • Which approach to the school makes sense?

    What exactly is the long-range plan, according to the Allegany County Commissioners?
    I’ve read in the Cumberland Times-News that the current County Commissioners intend to spend $9 million to construct a new high school.

    April 16, 2014

  • H.O.G. Rally coming to Cumberland in June

    Let me introduce myself. My name is Francine Kraft and I am the Maryland/Delaware State H.O.G. Rally Coordinator for 2014.
    With a team of seven others, we have put together a rally for June 19-22 to be held in Cumberland.

    April 16, 2014

  • Access to trout ponds hard for those who have trouble walking

    I took my 5-year-old grandson Easton, who lives in Cumberland, to the Evitts Creek three ponds on March 31, the day it was stocked with trout.He had the joy and excitement of catching his first trout and two more. I have a Maryland fishing license and trout stamp.

    April 16, 2014

  • Wait long enough; they will die off without being cared for

    The letter to the editor of April 14 (“Military veterans have few friends in Washington, D.C.”),  I am afraid, hit the nail on the head — sort of — about this next set of returning veterans.

    April 16, 2014

  • Translations differ, but the message is eternal

    This letter is in response to a recent letter titled “One cannot compromise on God’s word” (April 13 Times-News). I had previously written a letter titled “Why are compromises so difficult to achieve” (April 7).

    April 15, 2014

  • Closing the loopholes will help clear the regulatory waters

    After a decade of uncertainty over Clean Water Act jurisdiction following Supreme Court challenges in 2001 and 2006, the Environmental Protection Agency and Army Corps of Engineers announced a forthcoming administrative rule to close enforcement loopholes, restoring protections to 20 million acres of wetlands, more than half the nation’s streams, and drinking water for 117 million Americans.

    April 15, 2014

Latest news
Must Read
House Ads