Capital News Service
WASHINGTON — The Washington Redskins team name was lambasted as “racist” and “demeaning” during a daylong symposium Thursday at the Smithsonian’s National Museum of the American Indian.
The symposium, titled “Racist Stereotypes and Cultural Appropriation in American Sports,” featured Native American activists, museum administrators and local journalists who discussed the impact of team names like the Redskins on American Indians.
“There is a very insidious quality ... of viewing native Americans as savages, as playthings,” said N. Bruce Duthu, a professor of Native American Studies at Dartmouth University.
The panel, which included several American Indians, shared their personal experiences with racism and criticized Washington Redskins owner Dan Snyder and NFL Commissioner Roger Goodell for their reluctance to change the team name and logo.
The heated debate over the Redskins name goes back several decades. A case that challenged the name reached the U.S. Supreme Court.
Organizers said the Redskins declined invitations to attend the symposium. Tony Wyllie, the Washington Redskins’ senior vice president of communications, declined to comment on the team’s name.
Ben Nighthorse Campbell, a former Colorado senator, called Redskins head coach Mike Shanahan a “personal friend” and said he has a problem with the team name, not the team.
“Americans are ingrained to be loyal to their team,” he said. “But some names just degrade all of us.”
Campbell, who became the first American Indian to serve in the U.S. Senate in more than 60 years when he was elected in 1992, introduced a bill in Congress in early 1990s banning the use of the term Redskins on federally owned land. Panelist Suzan Shown Harjo, president of the Washington-based Morning Star Institute, also attempted to get lawmakers to change the team name.
In 1992, she entered a lengthy court battle with the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office to void the Redskins trademark but lost in 2009 when the Supreme Court ruled that the plaintiffs waited too long to file their original case. There is another hearing filed by younger plaintiffs scheduled for March 7.
Lawyers for the Redskins have insisted the name is meant to honor American Indians, but the panelists strongly disagreed with that stance.
“Sports is a common bond, but I cannot in good conscience support the (Washington, D.C.) football team,” said Robert Holden of the National Congress of American Indians.
“I don’t think the owners understand that they’re not honoring us,” he added.
Although the Redskins have held onto their name, many colleges have eliminated their Indian mascots and team names that some viewed as racist.
In 2005, the NCAA announced it would ban the use of American Indian mascots during postseason tournaments after its research found that the images had “overwhelming evidence of potential harm.”
Delise O’Meally, an NCAA representative, said the initial responses to the ban were mostly negative and hostile. But support for the decision eventually grew.
“My personal integrity was questioned at first,” she said, before mentioning the response that stuck with her the most. She said a young American Indian woman told her, “You’ve made the right decision.”
American Indian activists have also found an ally in Washington, D.C., mayor Vincent Gray, who said if the team wants to return to the district there should discussions about changing the name. Gray also avoided saying “Redskins” in his State of the district speech last week, instead referring to “our Washington football team.”