Here is something you will never hear me say.
“I have enough light to shoot that 10-point buck, but there isn’t enough light to get it on camera, so I won’t pull the trigger.”
And, here is another thing you will never hear me say.
“That 8-point buck with a 16-inch antler spread is nice, but I’ll pass because he will really be a hog in two more years.”
If you want to hear that kind of stuff, watch the hunting shows on television. There’s a lot of that going around.
Speaking of big bucks, 2014 will be a year that the Maryland Wildlife & Heritage Service sets hunting regulations for the next two seasons: 2014-2015 and 2015-2016.
The one I want to watch closely will deal with antler restrictions in Garrett County. Let’s see if we can recap and project.
The Quality Deer Management Association’s chapter in Garrett County is going about restricting the kill of small bucks in the right way.
Those folks are asking landowners to voluntarily hold the buck kill to animals with at least three points on one side of the antlers. And, landowners controlling thousands of acres have gotten on board, according to QDMA spokesman A.J. Fleming.
However, when the 2013 General Assembly session opened in Annapolis back in January, Delegate Wendell Beitzel introduced a bill that would take that rule and apply it to all of Garrett County.
Beitzel later withdrew the bill after the wildlife agency revealed that the number of surviving fawns had dwindled in Garrett. Biologists said, too, that when hunters are restricted to killing smaller bucks, the doe harvest usually increases.
I know Beitzel is staying in touch with WHS, asking them to consider Garrett County antler restrictions during the upcoming regulation process.
That, of course, puts some pressure on the agency, because Beitzel can always reintroduce his bill.
And, because legislators who live some distance from Almost Maryland could not care less about an antler restriction bill in the Mississippi River drainage, it would very likely pass.
Once codified, another legislative act would be required to remove it.
That would prohibit a landowner who doesn’t give a hoot about antlers from shooting a 4-point on his own land.
That’s political wildlife management, not biological wildlife management.
The same people who believe I am opposed to fly fishing for trout, believe I am opposed to antler restrictions.
Wrong. I simply think both activities should be hunter/fisher/landowner decisions, not state laws.
Elsewhere on this page, you will see that the buck harvest numbers in Garrett County for bowhunting in September and October have decreased from a year ago. So has the buck kill for the three-day early muzzleloader hunt.
When you limit the buck kill via voluntary antler restrictions, you’ll have that.
We’ll have to wait until Brian Eyler and the other WHS deer biologists crunch the numbers to see if the majority of the bucks killed in Garrett so far this year have three or more antler points on one side.
But the doe kill so far is down in Garrett as well.
All of this points out what we already knew. Wildlife management is not an exact science.
Contact Outdoor Editor Mike Sawyers at firstname.lastname@example.org.
Here is something you will never hear me say.
- Michael A Sawyers - Outdoors
No Bambi for you, Mrs. Doe
Some people want so badly for deer birth control to work that they actually think it will, even on wild populations.
I wish I had a couple bridges to sell.
A week ago on the Outdoors page we ran the deer there do what deer everywhere do. They eat the easiest food available such as gardens and ornamental plantings. They walk in front of moving cars. They give ticks and parasites a place to live.
Black bear biologist explains new hunt
The Maryland Wildlife & Heritage Service has abandoned the bear harvest quota system in use for 10 hunting seasons and has set the next two hunts at four days apiece.
South Branch of Potomac River best place in W.Va. for trophy rainbows
I always enjoy the annual roundup supplied by the West Virginia Division of Natural Resources that reveals where all the trophy fish were caught.
Mettiki will once again produce trout
Brian Richardson is confident that the Maryland Fisheries Service will, little by little and year by year, get to the point where full production is restored to the state’s trout hatchery system, meaning that fish will no longer have to be purchased from private sources.
The answer my friend ...
Recently, the Times-News published
a photograph of sea gulls that had
landed on the parking lot at Braddock
Center in LaVale
My first thought
was, “If those sea
gulls landed in the
Gunpowder River or
Big Hunting Creek
on their way here
from the ocean I
hope they didn’t have
felt soles on their
feet, otherwise they
will spread rock snot
to our trout streams
in Allegany and Garrett counties.”
Gobbler stuff can get crazy
Tough, old bird
The third gobbler I killed was in 1990 while hunting on Pond Hill near McCoole. Relatively early in the morning I sent out a couple yelp calls. Immediately, 75-100 yards away, what sounded like three gobblers got into a fight.
Almost Maryland welcomes you back
If you are a hunter in Almost Maryland, circle Thursday on your calendar so you don’t forget to attend the 7 p.m. hearing at Mountain Ridge High School in Frostburg that deals with proposed hunting regulations for the next two years.
Gobbler radar activated
With only 54 days until it opens, the Maryland spring gobbler season is officially on the radar.
Region A buck, doe changes possible
The Maryland Wildlife & Heritage Service, the Allegany-Garrett Sportsmen’s Association, the Quality Deer Management Association and the Washington County Federation of Sportsmen have hashed out a new deer hunting concept for Region A, which includes Garrett, Allegany and the western portion of Washington counties.
Meshach Browning would say ‘Just do it’
I wonder if it is possible to attach a
GPS unit to legislation that has been
introduced at the Maryland General
- More Michael A Sawyers - Outdoors Headlines
- No Bambi for you, Mrs. Doe