Cumberland Times-News

Opinion

April 15, 2014

Translations differ, but the message is eternal

This letter is in response to a recent letter titled “One cannot compromise on God’s word” (April 13 Times-News). I had previously written a letter titled “Why are compromises so difficult to achieve” (April 7).

I agree that Christ was not one to compromise. I too also do believe that Jesus took upon himself the sin of all of creation, and that through his life, death and resurrection, we are all saved from our own, sinful self.

There is a lot more to Martin Luther and the Reformation than “Here I stand, so help me God!”

Luther’s intent was not to split the church, but rather through discussion on certain issues, such as the sale of indulgences, the Bible only being available in Latin and to the priesthood, the misuse of power within the church and a few other things; Luther’s intention was to rather through conversation to bring the church back on track, and to the understanding that ONLY by God’s grace, through faith in Jesus Christ, are we made right with God, not through buying indulgences, not through earning God’s grace or any other way.

Luther also proclaimed that the church is called to always reform, as in continually being made new. Luther also wanted for people to have the Bible available in their own language, so they could read the Bible for themselves, allowing for God’s Holy Spirit to work through God’s word.

And I guess this might be where the rub is: “God’s word.” The scriptures that have become our Bible, were not written in English, but rather Hebrew and Koine Greek, by human beings over thousands of years.  

Having studied Greek in seminary, I can assure you that Greek is an extremely complicated and difficult language, grammatically as well as the actual meaning of the various words, and it is virtually impossible to capture the full meaning of most words by translating it into one English word or phrase.

I did not learn Hebrew (Old Testament Language), but I have been told by those who did, that it is an equally difficult language to translate accurately.

Metanoia, by the way, is the Greek word from scripture often translated “repentance.” Many scholars have a problem with that translation, and many translators excuse by the fact that no English word can adequately convey the meaning of that Greek word.

So, it is a bit problematic, if one proclaims that one cannot compromise on God’s word. If we proclaim Jesus Christ as The Living Word of God, I can agree, because I believe that indeed to be true; God’s grace given to us in the life, death and resurrection of Jesus Christ.

We might need to compromise on the translated word of God; scholars have done so for thousands of years, and continue to do so, but I see no reason to compromise on God’s message of love and grace for all of us for eternity, nor Jesus command to love God and love our neighbor as ourselves.

The way we proclaim that love will always be contextual; cultures and the ways we live are always going to change, but the message of God’s love in Jesus is for eternity.

Maybe God’s Holy Spirit has a variety of ways to bring us that message.

Maybe we are too often the ones trying to fit God into a box that limits God to fit the way we want God to look like, rather than being open to the possibility that God can be so much bigger than anything we with our human minds can ever imagine.

Tormod Svensson, pastor

St. John’s Lutheran Church

Cumberland

1
Text Only
Opinion
  • Time to do it Time to do it

    It never made sense that criminal background checks were not made on medical license applications in Maryland. Fortunately — for the protection everybody — the background investigations may soon be a matter of routine.

    July 31, 2014 1 Photo

  • If you don’t like the way things are going, vote to change them

    I daily hear complaining about the decline of America. I also hear people say that things will only get worse and there is nothing we can do about it. Admittedly, I used to be like this.

    July 31, 2014

  • Thanks for publishing both sides, but only one was right

    Kudos to the Cumberland Times-News for publishing opposing Reader Commentaries (“Other groups get county funds, so should CHCO” and “No public funding for extremist organization,” July 30); a relatively minor issue, but a great demonstration of our cherished “Freedom of the Press.”

    July 31, 2014

  • Hold on a minute ... we know these guys

    Tom Bosley says this isn’t the Garrett County revival of “Space Cowboys”. They’re just getting the band back together — Bosley, Don Stemple, Oren Yoder and Matt Redinger. They’ve been there, done that, and they’re ready, willing and able to be there and do it again.

    July 31, 2014

  • They can say it’s in Timbuktu, but it’s still in West Virginia

    I feel that I have to respond to recent articles about the out of control Potomac Highlands Airport Authority.

    July 31, 2014

  • State would require disclosure of chemicals used at well sites

    A recent article (“Docs want full disclosure of chemicals that would be used in fracking process,” July 21, Page 1A) and editorial (“No secrets: Chemical use in fracking a concern to all,” July 22) in the Times-News might have caused confusion about Maryland’s proposal on public disclosure of chemicals used in hydraulic fracturing.

    July 31, 2014

  • If we don’t sell it to them, somebody else will

    The front page article on coal exports by AP writer Dina Cappiello is one of the most asinine and biased “news” articles I’ve read (“Not in my backyard: U.S. sending dirty coal abroad,” July 29 Times-News, Page 1A).

    July 30, 2014

  • Research cost of watershed plan before implementing it

    July 30, 2014

  • ‘Prayers in the Park’ event slated Aug. 18 in Johnstown

    July 30, 2014

  • Not a villain Not a villain

    Time was that we looked for heroes. Heroes of the make-believe variety have sold a lot of comic books. We also had real-life heroes like Presidents Franklin D. Roosevelt and John F. Kennedy, whose deaths the whole nation mourned.
    These days, we seem to be more interested in looking for villains. “Vote for me because I’m the good guy” has taken a back seat to “Don’t vote for him, because he’s the bad guy.”

    July 29, 2014 1 Photo