Cumberland Times-News

Opinion

December 13, 2012

Stopping charitable deductions no way to reduce the deficit

 

The new movie on Abraham Lincoln contains an unexpected pertinence, focusing as it does on a Congressional deadlock on the Constitutional Amendment abolishing slavery. 
While it would be pure folly to compare the possible results of the current political impasse in Washington with the most important social event of the 19th century, it might be worth noting that political compromise made the emancipation of slavery possible. 
The lack of compromise might well defeat a less worthy, but still important, legislative result that also contains some moral consequences.
One of the possible measures currently debated in Washington to reduce the federal deficit is to remove income tax deductions for charitable causes. 
At a time when the economic need of so many people is so critical, surely Congress can find more suitable measures to reduce the national deficit. 
To remove charitable deductions would produce another kind of deficit — a moral one. It shouldn’t take a tax benefit to help put food on family tables or provide presents to children during the holiday season. But it surely helps to increase the size of contributions. 
And by this time we should all know that the fundamental needs of many people in our area, and elsewhere, are great.
So let’s help others as much as we can and hope Congress does, too.
John Wiseman
Cumberland

1
Text Only
Opinion
  • Time to do it Time to do it

    It never made sense that criminal background checks were not made on medical license applications in Maryland. Fortunately — for the protection everybody — the background investigations may soon be a matter of routine.

    July 31, 2014 1 Photo

  • If you don’t like the way things are going, vote to change them

    I daily hear complaining about the decline of America. I also hear people say that things will only get worse and there is nothing we can do about it. Admittedly, I used to be like this.

    July 31, 2014

  • Thanks for publishing both sides, but only one was right

    Kudos to the Cumberland Times-News for publishing opposing Reader Commentaries (“Other groups get county funds, so should CHCO” and “No public funding for extremist organization,” July 30); a relatively minor issue, but a great demonstration of our cherished “Freedom of the Press.”

    July 31, 2014

  • Hold on a minute ... we know these guys

    Tom Bosley says this isn’t the Garrett County revival of “Space Cowboys”. They’re just getting the band back together — Bosley, Don Stemple, Oren Yoder and Matt Redinger. They’ve been there, done that, and they’re ready, willing and able to be there and do it again.

    July 31, 2014

  • They can say it’s in Timbuktu, but it’s still in West Virginia

    I feel that I have to respond to recent articles about the out of control Potomac Highlands Airport Authority.

    July 31, 2014

  • State would require disclosure of chemicals used at well sites

    A recent article (“Docs want full disclosure of chemicals that would be used in fracking process,” July 21, Page 1A) and editorial (“No secrets: Chemical use in fracking a concern to all,” July 22) in the Times-News might have caused confusion about Maryland’s proposal on public disclosure of chemicals used in hydraulic fracturing.

    July 31, 2014

  • If we don’t sell it to them, somebody else will

    The front page article on coal exports by AP writer Dina Cappiello is one of the most asinine and biased “news” articles I’ve read (“Not in my backyard: U.S. sending dirty coal abroad,” July 29 Times-News, Page 1A).

    July 30, 2014

  • Research cost of watershed plan before implementing it

    July 30, 2014

  • ‘Prayers in the Park’ event slated Aug. 18 in Johnstown

    July 30, 2014

  • Not a villain Not a villain

    Time was that we looked for heroes. Heroes of the make-believe variety have sold a lot of comic books. We also had real-life heroes like Presidents Franklin D. Roosevelt and John F. Kennedy, whose deaths the whole nation mourned.
    These days, we seem to be more interested in looking for villains. “Vote for me because I’m the good guy” has taken a back seat to “Don’t vote for him, because he’s the bad guy.”

    July 29, 2014 1 Photo