This is an improvement?
In the performance of my job I’m on the road driving a lot. In my business travels the other day I had to go from Cumberland to Cresaptown, so naturally, I took Interstate 68 to the Route 220 South exit.
When I drove from the exit ramp making a left turn onto Route 220 I was appalled by what they’ve done to “correct” the poor planning at the bottom of the eastbound exit from 68 onto 220. What a royal mess!
They have actually raised the road and put in an S turn on the downhill slope of 220. Smart move!
I happened to be two cars back from an 18-wheeler and actually felt sorry for the driver. The curve of the turn is tight and that driver had to do some fancy maneuvering to get that tractor and trailer through the turns.
I can’t help but wonder what will happen when it becomes covered with ice and snow. I know I’ll be going the long way around to get to Cresaptown.
The whole situation at that intersection is absolutely ludicrous and dysfunctional. Instead of getting better it’s getting worse.
Who’s bright idea was all of this? No one has yet to explain why this whole change was necessary.
Is there extra profit or incentive for putting in these circles? Is there extra reward if you can make them more dangerous? Humor.
A tremendous amount of money is being spent on something that was unnecessary to start with but then they got a “do over”!
We, the taxpayers, get to pay for this boondoggle and somewhere along the way is a designer, supervisor, director or whomever who should be held accountable for this unbelievable mess. It doesn’t take an engineer, but only a minimal amount of common sense to see that this whole road design is dangerous.
Can someone please explain the whole rationale behind all of this? Considering the fact that we’re footing the bill aren’t we entitled to an explanation?
Is it unreasonable for the public to want to know why and how all of this happened and who is responsible? If, in fact, there is an explanation for all of this there should be no problem conveying that information to the public.
This is an improvement?
Water-cooler diplomacy is needed in the Middle East
I liked the forced integration in the Fifties and Sixties because it had a jarring affect on American consciousness. Segregation was outlawed, and integration became the rule of the land.
Hold on a minute ... we know these guys
Tom Bosley says this isn’t the Garrett County revival of “Space Cowboys”. They’re just getting the band back together — Bosley, Don Stemple, Oren Yoder and Matt Redinger. They’ve been there, done that, and they’re ready, willing and able to be there and do it again.
Time to do it
It never made sense that criminal background checks were not made on medical license applications in Maryland. Fortunately — for the protection everybody — the background investigations may soon be a matter of routine.
If you don’t like the way things are going, vote to change them
I daily hear complaining about the decline of America. I also hear people say that things will only get worse and there is nothing we can do about it. Admittedly, I used to be like this.
Thanks for publishing both sides, but only one was right
Kudos to the Cumberland Times-News for publishing opposing Reader Commentaries (“Other groups get county funds, so should CHCO” and “No public funding for extremist organization,” July 30); a relatively minor issue, but a great demonstration of our cherished “Freedom of the Press.”
They can say it’s in Timbuktu, but it’s still in West Virginia
I feel that I have to respond to recent articles about the out of control Potomac Highlands Airport Authority.
State would require disclosure of chemicals used at well sites
A recent article (“Docs want full disclosure of chemicals that would be used in fracking process,” July 21, Page 1A) and editorial (“No secrets: Chemical use in fracking a concern to all,” July 22) in the Times-News might have caused confusion about Maryland’s proposal on public disclosure of chemicals used in hydraulic fracturing.
If we don’t sell it to them, somebody else will
The front page article on coal exports by AP writer Dina Cappiello is one of the most asinine and biased “news” articles I’ve read (“Not in my backyard: U.S. sending dirty coal abroad,” July 29 Times-News, Page 1A).
- Research cost of watershed plan before implementing it
- ‘Prayers in the Park’ event slated Aug. 18 in Johnstown
- More Opinion Headlines
- Water-cooler diplomacy is needed in the Middle East